Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	Scott Evans <gse AT antisleep DOT com>
Subject:	Re: SPEWS blocked me
Date:	19 Nov 2002 14:24:16 -0500
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<adk5nz1b.fsf@templarcorp.com>
References:	<3DD9DA81 DOT 9040908 AT netstd DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ip209-19-232-50.z232-19-209.customer.algx.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	main.gmane.org 1037733742 26404 209.19.232.50 (19 Nov 2002 19:22:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence (Windows))

Wu Yongwei <adah AT netstd DOT com> writes:
> OK, you might be right. Thanks that you at least provide a way to bypass
> the foolish "anti-spam" mechanism.
> 
> The fact is that I hate the way SPEWS works. It thinks it is the crusade
> and refuses to remove individual IPs.

I can't stand those folks.  Their attitude sucks.

But Christopher's right, it's really no big deal to register and get
past the spam blocking for the cygwin list.



--
 scott evans :: www.antisleep.com




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -