Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:03:04 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Hey hey, I now have the emacs 100% cpu usage bug too [CGF, this one is for you]
Message-ID:	<20021115220304.GE27413@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<9910-Fri15Nov2002203400+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20021115220048 DOT 63683 DOT qmail AT web20808 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20021115220048.63683.qmail@web20808.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:00:48PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>
>--- David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
>> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
>> > Note that there were multiple snapshots generated
>> yesterday so if you
>> > grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile to
>> grab the latest.
>> 
>> Multiple versions dated 2002-11-14?
>> 
>> Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem
>> with his 2002-11-14
>> snapshot?
>
>I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still
>reproduced the problem.

cygcheck output?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -