delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Comments: | BlackMail headers - Mail to abuse AT unix197 DOT hosting-network DOT com. to report spam. |
X-Comments: | See http://www.bitgate.com/spam/ for info on this software. |
X-Comments: | These headers are here for you to report spam! |
X-Authenticated-Connect: | 64.83.30.152 |
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: | 14:36:55(EST) on November 15, 2002 |
X-HELO-From: | bradshaw2k |
X-Mail-From: | <mark AT networksimplicity DOT com> |
X-Sender-IP-Address: | 64.83.30.152 |
Message-ID: | <00d601c28cde$728ee170$981e5340@bradshaw2k> |
From: | "Mark Bradshaw" <mark AT networksimplicity DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <3DD4FCB5 DOT 5010800 AT umwelt-campus DOT de> <00c801c28caf$7439b6a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20021115153506 DOT GC2487 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Problems with installer |
Date: | Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:37:34 -0500 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 |
Here. Sorry if there is some confusion. Frankly, considering the number of installs I think the confusion has been minimal. As a side note I've many times been in conversation with a user and suggested that it might be time to can the package as no longer necessary. EVERY time they vehemently protest that the cygwin sshd install is too hard/doesn't work/whatever. The bar to entry to a tight sshd install under the cygwin installer may be too high for most newbies. Maybe as a compromise I can start using standard cygwin directories. That seemed confusing, and would definitely hose up some people that are used to my current structure, but I'd be willing if it's really causing communal heartburn. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: Re: Problems with installer > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:01:11PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: > >Aargh! NetworkSimplicity SSH rears its ugly head once again. > > I'm seriously beginning to think that setup.exe should detect > a "NetworkSimplicity" installation and nuke it. Seriously. > > Is anyone from NetworkSimplicity reading this mailing list or > do they just like to generate confusion? > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |