Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Norton Allen <allen AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
Message-Id:	<200211151939.OAA07302@bottesini.harvard.edu>
Subject:	Re: Setup installed to c:/cygwin/usr/bin
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:39:07 -0500 (est)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0211151410260.4275-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> from "Igor Pechtchanski" at Nov 15, 2 02:15:11 pm
MIME-Version:	1.0

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> Hmm, don't know if there is a way in NT to restrict access to HKLM
> registry entries, but it certainly sounds like the second user doesn't see
> these entries...  This might not matter, but is either of them a domain
> user, by any chance?
>
> > > I'm assuming, of course, that you ran 'mount' as the original installing
> > > user.
> >
> >   I never explicitly ran mount. Presumably it was run by setup
> >   during the original install.
> >    -Norton
> 
> I meant the 'mount' the output of which you posted to the list.  It would
> be interesting to see the output of 'mount' run by the second user as
> well.

  The mount output I posted was for the second user (not the
  original installer), but the mount output for the original
  installer looks identical. Neither is a domain user.

  I just noticed that the original installer does not have
  any entry for Cygwin under HKEY_USERS whereas the other
  user does. Curious.
    -Norton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -