Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:06:22 -0500
From:	Scott W Brim <swb AT employees DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FAT32, "lock count exceeded", mutt etc.
Message-ID:	<20021113170616.GA1400@SBRIM-W2K1>
Mail-Followup-To:	Scott W Brim <swb AT employees DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<011c01c28a6e$712e2380$6401a8c0 AT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <20021113022414 DOT GA98225245 AT HPN5170X>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20021113022414.GA98225245@HPN5170X>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 09:24:14PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet allegedly wrote:
> Mutt needs two fixes to run on FAT:
> - a fix to Cygwin, included since October.
> - a patch to mutt, see below.
> The mutt maintainer is aware of this patch. I hope it eventually
> will become part of the mutt distribution. It helps FAT without
> hurting anything.

Pierre: Thanks, but I still get lock file exceeded errors.  Could you
send me your mutt compile options, cygwin version, whatever you think is
relevant?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -