Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:18:23 +0000
Message-ID:	<3632-Wed13Nov2002161823+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Not just X (Was: Cygwin Emacs-X uses 99% of cpu)
In-Reply-To:	<6733-Wed13Nov2002144750+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
References:	<7BCD42353C1FD411A66200062939B2F1ACA4FB AT EXCHANGE>
	<6733-Wed13Nov2002144750+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>

On Wednesday 13 Nov 02, David Starks-Browning writes:
> I also observe emacs spinning.  I see it with both emacs and
> emacs-nox.  I also see it on an old cygwin non-X build of xemacs-21.5.
> So it's not strictly related to X.  (Except that it is very easily
> triggered by emacs + X.)
> 
> I observe it in cygwin-1.3.15-1 and 1.3.15-2.  It all goes away if I
> revert to cygwin-1.14-1.  This is WinNT 4.0.
> 
> ...
> 
> Would it help if I tried snapshots between 1.3.14 and 1.3.15 to narrow
> it down?

I find that this is the last snapshot without the problem:

CYGWIN_NT-4.0 BRYCE 1.3.15s(0.62/3/2) 20021103 23:52:20 i686 unknown

This snapshot exhibits the problem:

CYGWIN_NT-4.0 BRYCE 1.3.16s(0.63/3/2) 20021106 21:24:12 i686 unknown

(Although I'm quite ignorant about Cygwin internals, my money is on
the sigproc.cc changes...)

Hope this helps.

Regards,
David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -