Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:06:57 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: RFD: cygipc ENOSYS patch
Message-ID:	<20021112160657.GA13279@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20021105153841 DOT GA1756 AT tishler DOT net> <3DD124EC DOT 9090101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3DD124EC.9090101@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:57:32AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>I've no objection.  But would somebody PLEASE tell me what the HELL 
>we're waiting for with respect to the 64bit key_t change in newlib?
>
>I've had a new release of cygipc waiting for months, predicated on that 
>change, which I THOUGHT would happen "real soon".

Who was supposed to make the change?  I haven't been paying much attention
to what's required.  It does seem that our cygserver maintainer is MIA,
though, so maybe that's part of the problem.  I was hoping that we'd
have a little more cygserver exposure in cygwin 1.3.1[345] but it
doesn't seem to be happening.

cgf

>Now, I have to revert all of that (I didn't make a branch point at the 
>time -- why bother? the change was "imminent") before I release any 
>other updates.
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00314.html and following.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -