Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<00a101c28998$b2d36d30$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Harig, Mark A." <maharig AT idirect DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<BADF3C947A1BD54FBA75C70C241B0B9E763046 AT ex02 DOT idirect DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Is RSA authentication on SSH still broken?
Date:	Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:40:44 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Harig, Mark A. <maharig AT idirect DOT net> wrote:
> OK.  So, it appears that Cygwin users
> of openssh have one of two options:
>
> 1. chmod 700 ~
>    chgrp 18 ~/.ssh
>    chmod 750 ~/.ssh
>
> or
>
> 2. chmod 755 ~
>    chmod 700 ~/.ssh
>
> Do you have a recommendation on which of
> these two options is more secure?

I'm assuming you meant:
$ chmod 750 ~
$ chgrp 18 ~
$ chmod 700 ~/.ssh
Since obviously world-readable ~ is less secure than user-only-readable ~.

In which case, 1. seems better to me, because it actually grants SYSTEM
permissions where it needs them, rather than granting them somewhere else
and Windows weirdness making things work.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -