Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20021106191839.02b745e0@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Wed, 06 Nov 2002 19:21:03 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problem with function keys codes with vt100 emulation
In-Reply-To:	<20021107030356.GA31475@redhat.com>
References:	<20021107024215 DOT GA16492 AT redhat DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106163952 DOT 02068e70 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106131511 DOT 0212e850 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106151936 DOT 01febb78 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106163952 DOT 02068e70 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106181835 DOT 02a5b3c0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<20021107024215 DOT GA16492 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Chris,

I'm still missing something.

Here's one line from my .inputrc:

"\M-[[A"    "fg %1\C-M"

This does not interfere with up-arrow doing history selection. It does what 
I expect it to: Insert "fg %1<RETURN>".

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 19:03 2002-11-06, you wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:42:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:23:37PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>Chris,
> >>
> >>At 18:07 2002-11-06, you wrote:
> >>>...
> >>>
> >>>I will note that it is very weird that F1 - F4 in cygwin are generating
> >>>the same sequences as up/down/left/right.  Something is messed up
> >>>somewhere, there.
> >>
> >>It would be weird if it were happening, but I have readline ("~/.inputrc")
> >>mappings for all the Fn keys and "Insert" and "Delete" as well as the 
> usual
> >>pre-defined, built-in mappings for the arrow keys. Though I usually keep
> >>NumLock engaged, the arrow keys on the number pad work fine when I
> >>disengage it.
> >
> >But, if you type F1 while you are in /bin/sh, you'll see the cursor move
> >up a line.  That indicates that cygwin is mapping F1 to ^[[A, which is,
> >AFAICT, incorrect.  It probably *should* be mapping to ^[OP.  And, F2
> >should be ^[OQ, etc.
>
>Nevermind.  I see.  That's the way linux does it.  Seems odd to me.  Why
>map f1 to be the same as up arrow?
>
>cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -