Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<007e01c28445$b0c510f0$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Jens Yllman" <jens AT yllman DOT com>
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20021104214628 DOT 01f89700 AT pop3 DOT yllman DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.
Date:	Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:03:57 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Jens Yllman <jens AT yllman DOT com> wrote:

> But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for
> granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they
> seem to be functions.

So? Dropping your unnecessary :: is not "taking for granted that they always
are defines".

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -