Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.1.6.0.20021104214628.01f89700@pop3.yllman.com>
X-Sender:	jens AT pop3 DOT yllman DOT com
Date:	Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:48:58 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Jens Yllman <jens AT yllman DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.
Mime-Version:	1.0

But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for granted 
that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they seem to be 
functions.

Jens Yllman


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -