Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:49:57 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: It's x86
Message-ID:	<20021101144957.GD3332@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021031120202 DOT 01fec528 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3DC255BB DOT D175D761 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3DC255BB.D175D761@yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:21:47AM -0500, CBFalconer wrote:
>Such architecture optimizations are much more likely to have been
>taken in the GUI gubris that is being used for display than in
>GCC/GDB themselves.  I think the moral is that such settings
>should be recorded in the distribution.

None of the mentioned gcc command line options were used in compiling
gdb.

This is getting tiresome.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -