Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/10/30/15:45:28
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:30:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:20:39PM -0500, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote:
>>Perhaps this makes sense as a step in the process but it can't be the
>>end-game if folks really want to make the process easier for everyone.
>>I'm not against any steps necessary if it improves any part of Cygwin
>>but unless the improvement actually folds into the final product
>>(Cygwin itself) as Chris points out, various disjointed and
>>disconnected solutions will likely lead to more confusion and problems
>>in the future. It's worth thinking about for anyone that's taken the
>>first step. This stuff can all be helpful. Let's try to get it all in
>>one place! :-)
>
>In this case the information provided could possibly be considered more
>confusing than what is already available, too. So, submitting
>documentation for review and incorporation would theoretically weed out
>the confusing or incorrect parts.
Just to be clear, I'm referring to the information provided on the
external web site that is intended to help people with ssh problems.
cgf
--
Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions or observations.
Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ .
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -