Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:16:48 +0000
From:	Danny Smith <dannysmith AT clear DOT net DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: Problem compiling cpp programs with gcc-3.2-1
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	Danny Smith <dannysmith AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Message-id:	<000701c27ef1$3dc2a620$0398a7cb@DANNY>
MIME-version:	1.0
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-priority:	Normal

From: Mark Schoenberg <mark at emmestech dot com>
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:51:59 +1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

>     The problems described below appeared after I upgraded to the
latest
> versions of the cygwin release.  It disappeared when I went back to
gcc-2.95.3,
> leaving all the other utilities at the latest version.  This suggests
to me the
problem lies in gcc-3.2.1, or in how I have it configured.
>
> Why won't
> gcc simp.cpp -o simp
>
> compile the incredibly simple program below without generating
e-messages like
>
> /DOCUME~1/Mark/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccRtp1xR.o(.eh_frame+0x11):simp.cpp:
undefined reference to `___gxx_personality_v0'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
>      Why must I replace gcc with g++ or c++ after upgrading from
gcc-2.95.3-5 to
> 3.2.1 ?

The exception handling functions for g++ are in libstdc++.a with version
3.x.  G++ adds libstdc++.a to libraries, GCC does not.

 With 2.9.x the C++ exceptions and new/delete functions  were in
libgcc.a
>
> Are error messages like
>
> /DOCUME~1/Mark/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccBuHJFC.o(.text+0x948):anv.cpp:
undefined .
> reference to `operator new(unsigned)'
> /DOCUME~1/Mark/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccBuHJFC.o(.text+0x979):anv.cpp:
undefined .
> reference to `__cxa_begin_catch'
> /DOCUME~1/Mark/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccBuHJFC.o(.text+0x9a5):anv.cpp:
undefined
> reference to `__cxa_end_catch'
>
> in response to compiling a slightly more complicated cpp program with
gcc
> related, or due to something else?

They are same problem.

> My slightly more complicated program will
> compile if I replace gcc with g++, but the compiled program bombs
immediately.


Could you post "slightly more complicated program". It may relate to
Dwarf2 eh vs Windows messages.

Danny

>
>      Is there a simple fix other than using gcc-2.95.3-5 instead of
3.2-1?>

> Thank you, Mark Schoenberg



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -