Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3DB9866D.80502@indirect.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:59:09 -0700
From:	"Michael F. March" <march AT indirect DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin, emacs, mozilla
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021024122730 DOT 029dac50 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3DB85943 DOT D33D8954 AT yahoo DOT com> <3DB8EBC7 DOT 5050602 AT lapo DOT it>
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.2.20021024122730.029dac50@pop3.cris.com>

>
>
>> I am amazed that, considering the warm fuzzy loving relationship
>> between Microsoft and Netscape/Mozilla, they continue to use VC. I 
>> would expect them to lean over backwards to move over to gcc.
>>
> They are indeed, but converting the big build process from VC to gcc 
> is not so easy an operation ^_^
>
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134113
>
> BTW: of course they would like some help ;-)
>
Maybe the first step would be to get Mozilla to compile under Cygwin 
using X instead of
using all the Windows APIs directly (like what they are trying to do in 
that Bugzilla ticket
above.)  In fact, getting Evolution and Mozilla working under 
XFree86/Cygwin would be
two worth while efforts.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -