Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/10/25/02:26:57
tprinceusa wrote:
>
... snip ...
> >
> I witnessed a Microsoft lecture today where the speaker said over
> and over again that .NET is the answer to everything, including
> all applications currently running on any OS, but they will NOT
> support anything which supports posix, although there may be a new
> Interix in the works. They invite anyone who is important enough
> to sign up for 3 days or a week of help in Redmond to get their
> applications changed to a version which will run only on .NET and
> differentiate it from what could be done on linux [or cygwin?].
> To me, at least, this looked like confirmation that they disfavor
> cygwin.
I have a book here about the organization and creation of NT,
written in the NT3.1 days. The writer was female, and I forget
her name (the book is not at hand). It specifically states that
one of the design objectives was a complete Posix layer, on an
equal basis with the W32 layer. At the time the system seemed to
make a lot of sense to me, but it sounds as if they have dropped
everything not intimately connected with oligarchy.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -