| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
| Path: | not-for-mail |
| From: | =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler AT upb DOT de> |
| Subject: | Re: paths like //usr/local |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:09:27 +0200 |
| Lines: | 22 |
| Message-ID: | <aohos4$hn8$1@main.gmane.org> |
| References: | <aohlcb$unv$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20021015181721 DOT GB11463 AT redhat DOT com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | pd953cc64.dip.t-dialin.net |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Trace: | main.gmane.org 1034708676 18152 217.83.204.100 (15 Oct 2002 19:04:36 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:04:36 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
| X-Accept-Language: | de, en |
>>a path like //usr/local is treated as an UNC path. >>this might leads to problems when an application is using //usr/local as >>a normal "unix"-path. >> >>i don't know how to overcome the problem, but one might think of a path >>like /unc/computer/share instead of using the path //computer/share >> >>what was the idea behind the current behaviour? > > Do you think that Microsoft employees read this mailing list? I'm sure > that there are one or two but I doubt that they could speak definitively > about why Microsoft chose this behavior. cygwin translates paths like /usr/local to c:\cygwin\usr\local and manages mount-points etc... cygwin opffers a complete "virtual filesystem" the cygwin-developers chose, to NOT convert //usr/local to c:\cygwin\usr\local i would like to know why. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |