Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	swamp-dog AT ntlworld DOT com (Guy Harrison)
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Viruses being transported with cygwin messages
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:11:30 GMT
Reply-To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3db2984b.162869964@smtp.ntlworld.com>
References:	<006601c272eb$5750f680$855a580c AT who> <20021013191503 DOT GA976 AT redhat DOT com> <005c01c27322$0e97b1e0$9573580c AT who>
In-Reply-To:	<005c01c27322$0e97b1e0$9573580c@who>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g9EAEuT22576

On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:36:02 -0400, "Gregg C Levine"
<drwho8 AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> wrote:

>Hello from Gregg C Levine
>Okay. I'll agree with you on that notion, Christopher. No real arguement
>there. Now as to about those messages? Are those actual messages? I'm
>inclined to think not.

Nope. Two arrived here. The original messages are in the archives...

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00071.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg00636.html

...whereas the new arrivals have truncated html-ized text and what looks
like Bugbear - identical 50.6k (?upx compressed?) binaries:

connexionscard-pass.txt.scr
james_simmons_1.jpg.scr

Neither has any connection with their original poster.


-- 
swamp-dog AT ntlworld DOT com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -