Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gerald S. Williams" <gsw AT agere DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: "Application failed to initialize (0xc0000022)"
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:09:42 -0400
Message-ID:	<GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFCEPKCLAA.gsw@agere.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFGEPJCLAA.gsw@agere.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Now I'm pretty convinced it's not a rebase thing but
some time of security/access issue.

I found a few references in MSDN referring to this error
message. They seem to have to do with access rights and
directories searched for a DLL (e.g., if you don't have
rights to a network drive in your path). That particular
problem isn't happening, but at least it's a lead.

Hmmm... Could the SHM extension be causing something like
a setuid()? Perhaps I have to bounce over to the XFree86
list after all...

-Jerry


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -