Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[198.151.129.77]
From:	"Matthew Clark" <DrMCClark0 AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	"Robert Collins" <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<OE48lvoNGE5nCz0b4dj000012c9 AT hotmail DOT com> <1034289182 DOT 31694 DOT 3 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Subject:	Re: Unable to compile setup.exe source
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:03:13 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID:	<OE54RJBJ1qCVxqY4tbq00001d7c@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	11 Oct 2002 13:03:21.0538 (UTC) FILETIME=[93654A20:01C27126]

Robert Collins wrote:

> I'm trying to compile setup.exe from the setup-2.249.2.5.tar.bz2 tarball
> according the directions in=20
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html
>
> I get down to the final link step and I get errors complaining about,
> undefined references to things like ostream, oo_malloc, streambuf, etc.
I'm
> no C++ expert, but I can't see what's missing from the final link step.
Can
> anyone clue me in?

> Yes, you're bulid with gcc 2.95, and then linking with gcc 3.2
> libraries, and thats not supported. You ened to build and link with gcc
> 2,95 libs.

How did I get gcc 3.2 libs in the mix?  More importantly, how do I
force gcc 2.95 libs to be linked instead?

Matt

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -