Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B22D0@wilber.adroit.com>
From:	"Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Moving cygwin discussions to Usenet? (e.g., alt.os.cygwin)
Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:14:27 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0

> From: raphael [mailto:raphael AT oninet DOT pt]
> Subject: Re: Moving cygwin discussions to Usenet? (e.g., 
> alt.os.cygwin)
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:35AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Please provide the URL of such a reply.  Stating that a thing is so
> > without proof is not useful.
> 
> Glad you ask. Examine thread "Crontab problems" 
> MID <20020911204824 DOT 7327 DOT qmail AT web21008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
> it shows my point.
> 
 If that's your point it's a pretty weak one.
You got two answers to your question.  One discussed
the issue at length in a way you found useful.
 The other was a correct answer, although unnecessarily
succinct.  Nicholas is known to have a strange "vi"
fetish but it's really quite harmless.  It takes two to
tango and if you hadn't gone out of YOUR way to provoke
a fight the subsequent flame-fest could have been avoided.

Anyway, please go ahead and start your list. I'm getting
tired of reading about it.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -