Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Package review status
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20020925235243.GA1261@redhat.com>
References:	<LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHKEJMCNAA DOT chris AT atomice DOT net>
	<1032951025 DOT 8300 DOT 101 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D919DA9 DOT 1010503 AT scytek DOT de>
	<1032954343 DOT 22908 DOT 5 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D91E548 DOT 1040300 AT scytek DOT de>
	<1032990763 DOT 22908 DOT 46 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D924091 DOT 5070508 AT scytek DOT de>
	<20020925235243 DOT GA1261 AT redhat DOT com>
Date:	26 Sep 2002 17:48:47 +1000
Message-Id:	<1033026528.24358.121.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 09:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Actually, I would first suggest taking this off list.  If it turns out
> to be a cygwin problem then you can discuss things here.
>=20
> I think that speculating about someone's personal gpg keys is remarkably
> off-topic for this list otherwise.

Yep, sorry. End-of-thread.

Rob


--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9krvfI5+kQ8LJcoIRAj2/AJ99DPP7B1VhcolZJJ5PDJI6f02+cQCggrhY
JNpqhRckiHDXFthINiDkcb0=
=tWxK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK--

- Raw text -