Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D921BEF.4040904@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:26:23 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: How is Cygwin's version stamp (currently 1.3.12-2) determined?
References:	<uofam9bfd DOT fsf AT world DOT std DOT com>
X-Note:	This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam.

Francis Litterio wrote:
> 
> What are the criteria for changing the Cygwin revision stamp?

The Cygwin DLL is analogous to the Linux kernel: its version number 
scheme is independent of the version number of the packages that run 
under it.  You can upgrade packages independently of the Cygwin DLL, at 
least until there's an ABI change.

Currently there is no one packaging cohesive "releases" under a single 
version number like the Linux distributors do.  It hasn't seemed necessary.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -