Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2002 22:10:50 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: limit for # of items created with "new" ?
Message-ID:	<20020925021050.GA10139@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<amqoqi$a3e$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0209241841560 DOT 7805-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020924185910 DOT 02c3d7c8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.2.20020924185910.02c3d7c8@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:06:22PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Hans,
>
>That looks like over 80 megabytes just for the dynamically allocated "node" 
>instances:
>
>85000 * 30 * (8 + 8) * 2
>
>If I understand correctly, all Cygwin app memory comes out of a single pool 
>(hence the Cygwin heap size registry entry), so a proper accounting of 
>available memory must take the other concurrently executing Cygwin 
>applications into account.

Sorry.  This isn't correct.  Each application gets its fixed-size own heap.
The heap isn't shared between applications.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -