delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/09/24/18:29:31

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:29:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Lost /bin/latex?
In-Reply-To: <87elbj1314.fsf@peder.flower>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0209241816400.7216-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

> Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> writes:
>
> > Am I going crazy, or has my computer lost /bin/latex?  For some reason I
> > recall using tetex to process latex documents.  However, now that I've
> > looked, I can't find /bin/latex.exe.
>
> That's strange.  Upgrading should have been automagically.
>
> > It's not even part of the tetex package.  Anyone else have that
> > problem?
>
> /usr/bin/tex.exe is in the tetex-bin package, please select and
> install that.  latex is just a symbolic link.
>
> Greetings,
> Jan.

Jan,

Thanks, I realized it's a symbolic link shortly after I sent the message.

However, something did go wrong with the installation.  I ended up with
invalid symbolic links in /bin (e.g., /usr/bin/initex was a symbolic link
to "bin/tex.exe").  Also, any attempt to run latex failed with a '(Fatal
format file error; I'm stymied)'.

This was still a problem after I completely uninstalled and reinstalled
the tetex packages (tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, tetex, and
libkpathsea3).

Running 'texconfig confall; texconfig rehash; texconfig init; texconfig
dvips printcmd -' fixed the 'Fatal error' problem, but the invalid
symbolic links are still there.  This sequence of texconfig commands is,
for some reason, commented out from the /etc/postinstall/post-tetex.sh,
but is present in /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh, and I assume has been
run (there is no log of the postinstall script invocations, is there?).

Anyway, I can change the links by hand, and latex now works (well enough
for me), but I thought the above merited your attention.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Water molecules expand as they grow warmer" (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019