Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D7A3D30.2030101@cox.net>
Date:	Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:53:52 -0400
From:	"David A. Cobb" <superbiskit AT cox DOT net>
Organization:	CoxNet User
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020905
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin Discussion <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	[BUG] Intermittant error referencing memory @0x00000010

Trying to do a bootstrap build of gcc-3.2-1, first cat.exe signalled
'cat.exe the instruction at 0x077f8ed61 referenced memory at 0x0000010. 
 The memory could not be "written"'
followed by "Application failed to initialize (0xC0000142)"

Retry, got the same error but in "sh.exe instruction at 0x77f8ed61" -- 
HEY! that's strange - the same instruction address.
must be in a dll, yes?

Today, tried the same and configure ran like a charm.  However, "make 
bootstrap" incurred the same
'memory at 0x00000010 could not be written' and 'App failed to 
initialize' errors in /usr/bin.gcc.exe

There seems no simple way to predict when this will happen, so I imagine 
any debug/strace output would be huge.
Is this a known bug?

-- 
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -