Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:41:16 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: orphaned child processes with rxvt
Message-ID:	<20020906214116.GA27100@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020906163808 DOT A23355 AT fnord DOT io DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020906163808.A23355@fnord.io.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:38:08PM -0500, Steve O wrote:
>> If I hit the "close" button in the window rather than typing "exit", rxvt
>> cleans up.. but there is still an "ssh" process alive and well sucking up 3
>> megs of ram.
>
>I was looking into this last night.  The rxvt source doesn't seem
>to do any process management on exit, which says to me that 
>the authors expect the child process to die when the parent
>dies. 
>
>So the question is, why are rxvt spawned processes under cygwin
>detached from their parents, whereas on other systems they aren't.
>Any ideas?

In theory, child processes in a process group should be receiving a SIGHUP
on exit.  Does ssh die on a SIGHUP?

Running rxvt under strace might be instructive.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -