Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20020903114943.029d8910@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Thu, 05 Sep 2002 17:02:36 -0700
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: A Simple Real World Benchmark for Cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<20020902101958.A27819@mn.rr.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Rick,

CPU & RAM:
	P4; 0.13 micron geometry (512K L2 cache); 2.38GHz (2.27 GHz normina)
	140 / 560 (QDR) FSB (overclocked from nominal 133 / 533 MHz)
	PC2700 RAM running 2-2-2-5 RAS/CAS timings

Disk:
	[ 17 Gb
	  10,000 RPM ] x2; Windows and Cygwin on separate spindles
	SCSI Ultra 160
	Adaptec 39160 in a 32-bit PCI slot; non-Ultra-160 devices on separate channel

OS:
	Windows 2K Pro; SP3

SWRB:
	real    0m14.925s
	user    0m12.262s
	sys     0m8.881s

By the way, does anybody see what's wrong with this picture? Is there any 
explanation for how over 21 seconds of CPU time were expended in less than 
15 seconds of clock time?


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -