Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:14:59 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getopt/getopt_long() broken behavior
Message-ID:	<20020905151459.GA16827@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<E17msMr-0000G7-00 AT smtp01 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<E17msMr-0000G7-00@smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:52:01AM -0400, chrismorgan AT rcn DOT com wrote:
>I noticed that getopt() and getopt_long() aren't doing reordering of
>argv entries.  Searching the cygwin-developers mailing list I found
>that this is due to compiling with POSIXLY_CORRECT set.  Is there any
>plan to move back to not setting this variable?

No.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -