Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<003d01c25325$8cd3a090$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020903030623 DOT 2413C586E AT ivory DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
Subject:	Re: How do you write scripts with portable filenames?
Date:	Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:35:49 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au wrote:
> "Portable" between Cygwin and Unix systems, that is.  I'm thinking of
> the problems caused in particular by command filenames having
> extensions on Windows and none on Unix.
>
> E.g. if I say "ls x", where X.EXE exists, ls will output x (as long as
> nocaseglob is set).  But "strings x" fails because the file x doesn't
> exist.
>
> Is my goal of writing portable shell scripts doomed?  Am I going to
> have to say "strings x.exe"?  :-(
>
> Is there any cool Cygwin magic to help with this, like there is in
> U/Win?

I _was_ pretty sure that this was supposed to 'just work'. (And it does with mv,
but not with rm). I guess this is a bug. I think you might be at least
temporarily stuck with using `uname` to find out if you are on cygwin, and
setting and using an EXEEXT variable throughout the script.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -