Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:36:13 +0300
From:	Ville Herva <vherva AT niksula DOT hut DOT fi>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: A Simple Real World Benchmark for Cygwin
Message-ID:	<20020902153613.GT3568@niksula.cs.hut.fi>
References:	<20020902101958 DOT A27819 AT mn DOT rr DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020902101958.A27819@mn.rr.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.25i

> TIME    CPU     MHZ     DISK            OS AND VERSION (secs)
> ------  ---     ---     --------------  ----------------------------------
> 5       P3      700     IBM 7200RPM     RH7.2, native
> 180     P3      700     IBM 7200RPM     win98 4.10.1998, cygwin 1.3.12-2

FWIW:

winXP, cygwin 1.3.12(0.54/3/2), 2xP3 900, 18GB 10k scsi
./configure  15.81s user 15.41s system 102% cpu 30.329 total

linux-2.2.21pre2, celeron-1000, old 9GB 7200 scsi
./configure  1.37s user 0.81s system 18% cpu 11.776 total

linux-2.4.13ac2, P3-600, 18GB 10k scsi
./configure  2.28s user 0.90s system 56% cpu 5.656 total

I believe XP is much better than 98 with cygwin?


-- v --

v AT iki DOT fi

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -