Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-WM-Posted-At:	avacado.atomice.net; Sat, 31 Aug 02 00:23:07 +0100
From:	"Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To:	"Cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Processor time bug in fhandler_proc.cc
Date:	Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:23:05 +0100
Message-ID:	<LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHCECJCLAA.chris@atomice.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<20020830200653.14247.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance:	Normal

> > I will make a patch for this that will also solve the problem with
> > the HERTZ
> > define.
> >
> > Please let me re-iterate here:
> >
> > Most of the /proc values DO NOT WORK ON WINDOWS 95/98/ME.
>
> Why not?
Because, AFAIK there is no way to get the required data from user mode.

That's not to say it's not possible, but rather I haven't investigated. I
don't use any of those versions of Windows so developing a solution would be
rather difficult and I am not motivated to do so.

Chris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -