| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:51:07 -0000 |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: Processor time bug in fhandler_proc.cc |
| From: | "Chris January" <ccj00 AT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk> |
| X-Client-IP: | 193.60.222.2 |
| Reply-To: | chris AT atomice DOT net |
| Message-Id: | <E17ko39-0002AF-00@duck.doc.ic.ac.uk> |
I will make a patch for this that will also solve the problem with the HERTZ define. Please let me re-iterate here: Most of the /proc values DO NOT WORK ON WINDOWS 95/98/ME. Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |