Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20020829082339.022be348@pop.rcn.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT rcn DOT com
Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:25:38 -0400
To:	"Nguyen Minh Sang" <SangNM AT fsoft DOT com DOT vn>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Maximum number of FD_SETSIZE = ?
In-Reply-To:	<A220D2C5610C714BA00110F541A4ABD9012644D2@home.fsoft.fpt.vn
	>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 05:11 AM 8/29/2002, Nguyen Minh Sang wrote:
>Hi Experts,
>
>On cygwin, in w32api/winsock.h:
>
>typedef struct fd_set {
>         u_int   fd_count;
>         SOCKET  fd_array[FD_SETSIZE];
>} fd_set;
>
>Follow document, default FD_SETSIZE = 64 and We can increase over 64.
>But I don't know the limit of that number = ? with the performance of
>system is still OK.


Check the email archives on this.  Chris Faylor provided the answer to 
this in the last week or so.  If you're looking for a more specific 
answer than what he gave, you'll want to look at the Cygwin DLL source.



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -