Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020827202906.72517.qmail@web21009.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	[gcc-3.2]: mbstate_t defined by gcc conflicts with cygwin header _types.h
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi,

I was joining in the fun of compiling xerces with the new gcc-3.2 and
the latest cygwin build from cvs.  Midway through I happened upon
this:


/usr/include/c++/3.2/cwchar:65: conflicting types for `typedef struct
mbstate_t 
   mbstate_t'
/usr/include/sys/_types.h:41: previous declaration as `typedef struct

   _mbstate_t mbstate_t'

A quick look at the package search shows that this file is unique to
gcc-3.2 and not earlier versions.   I also assume, based on the fact
that Abe and Gerrit have sucessfully built it, that this is a gcc-3.2
related issue.  The questions that come to mind are:

1)Should the Cygwin header be changed?
2)Should the g++ header be changed?
3)Should xerces define MBSTATE_T?

Not that this is necessarily a bug report, just thought I put it out
there to see what the others think.

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -