| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
| Path: | not-for-mail |
| From: | Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com> |
| Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
| Subject: | Re: DoD Security Clearance for cygwin? (OT) |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:06:29 -0700 |
| Lines: | 22 |
| Message-ID: | <3D652825.8070401@cotagesoft.com> |
| References: | <30C9E24891FFD411B68A009027724CB702C04D4C AT eg-002-015 DOT eglin DOT af DOT mil> <20020822021226 DOT GB14384 AT inetix DOT com DOT au> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | adsl-63-193-31-178.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Trace: | main.gmane.org 1030039615 3562 63.193.31.178 (22 Aug 2002 18:06:55 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date: | Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:06:55 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020618 Netscape/7.0b1 |
| X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en |
Graeme Merrall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:06:14AM -0500, Keen Wayne A Contr AFRL/MNGG wrote: > >>Cygwin is not used (at least in this office and lab) in an environment in >>which its security (or lack thereof) is an issue. >> >>Thats about all I can say and be secure. > As a non-US, non-military exposed individual I love this security stuff. As an aside to an OT aside, the question is important. If you have a host OS that has, say, a B1 certification (which I doubt Windows has, even disconnected from the Net :-), you don't want to run a system or application on it that could theoretically allow you to bypass those access checks (say, due to a bug in the authentication and authorization code). I wonder if anyone is sufficiently motivated to perform such a thorough security review of the entire Cygwin platform. -- Shankar. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |