Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:12:26 +1000
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: DoD Security Clearance for cygwin? (OT)
Message-ID:	<20020822021226.GB14384@inetix.com.au>
Mail-Followup-To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<30C9E24891FFD411B68A009027724CB702C04D4C AT eg-002-015 DOT eglin DOT af DOT mil>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<30C9E24891FFD411B68A009027724CB702C04D4C@eg-002-015.eglin.af.mil>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
From:	Graeme Merrall <graeme AT inetix DOT com DOT au>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:06:14AM -0500, Keen Wayne A Contr AFRL/MNGG wrote:
> Cygwin is not used (at least in this office and lab) in an environment in
> which its security
> (or lack thereof) is an issue.
> 
> Thats about all I can say and be secure.

As a non-US, non-military exposed individual I love this security stuff.
I recall a post on another mailing list in which the author had to
include a classified status to all his mails. They all started:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

So which one of you guys has got the Roswell bits in his office? :)
Just some Aussie humour there...

Cheers,
 Graeme

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -