Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	Joe Buehler <jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com>
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
Subject:	Re: Emacs colours [RE: GNU emacs 21.2-5 packages available]
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:39:21 -0400
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<3D610319.2070504@hekimian.com>
References:	<A5AF6F04CF7FD311BC5700902773DDC7E4019E AT exchange13 DOT rl DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	hekimian.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	main.gmane.org 1029767893 9613 206.205.138.10 (19 Aug 2002 14:38:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en

Adye, TJ (Tim) wrote:

>>- black on black is no longer the default color scheme


> I can see why this is necessary for emacs running in a "DOS box", but is
> ugly and should not be necessary when displayed in a rxvt or xterm window,
> or when using the X11 interface. I know I can change this back (I haven't
> found out how, but I'm sure a little investigation will find it: emacs -r
> isn't enough), but it would be cleanest to keep similar defaults as all
> other versions (not least because I have a common .emacs).
> 
> Could I suggest that the reverse colours only be the default for the non-X11
> interface, when run in a DOS box ($TERM=cygwin, I think)?

You can change site-init.el if you don't like the current scheme.  It's a hack
until I figure out what emacs is doing wrong, so it will revert to proper
colors once I track it down.

> One other minor point, is that I've noticed that describe-function doesn't
> always work, where it does in NT and RH7.2 Emacs 21.2, eg.

This looks like an emacs install bug -- the DOC file is made but not installed.
I'll look at it.

Joe Buehler




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -