Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <skoehler AT upb DOT de>
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
Subject:	Re: Problems with CPAN
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:31:19 +0200
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<3D47BC77.9090405@upb.de>
References:	<31CB870AD5AA384BB5419025DD9F7A84104355 AT dailymail DOT cfs DOT ac DOT uk> <31CB870AD5AA384BB5419025DD9F7A8410435A AT dailymail DOT cfs DOT ac DOT uk> <20020731114049 DOT D3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <MPG DOT 17b1c9bfc73271e4989694 AT news DOT gmane DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pd953ce14.dip.t-dialin.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	main.gmane.org 1028111438 18971 217.83.206.20 (31 Jul 2002 10:30:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721
X-Accept-Language:	de, en

>>Nooooo.  It's way easier.  If an application uses stat() and
>>checks the uid against the posix permission bits, it fails
>>since your uid is definitely not the uid of the admins group.
>>
>><snip rest of highly techie explanation>
> 
> In what sense are you using the phrase 'way easier' in the first 
> sentence? The rest of your stuff goes right over the head of this 
> part of the target audience!

in fact is was easier:
- the perl script checked the permission - what went wrong since NT ACLs 
are much more complicated than unix RWX-stuff
- bash does not use any test - it just opens/runs the file to check if 
it has access.

but: shouldn't there be a better conversion of NT-ACLs to unix-perms?
perhaps a POSIX-ACL implementation?




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -