Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<005e01c24435$f6620690$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<00fd01c243e3$2ea09bf0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <87znvoa5r8 DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower>
Subject:	Re: texmf src package is a copy of the tetex source package (or at least has the same length and md5sum)
Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:30:05 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net> writes:
>> Since the current texmf is only an upgrade helper, it doesn't really
>> need a source package at all.
>
> Why do you feel that way?  The upgrade helper packages were also
> created, and thus have a source package (but a bit smaller than 39MB
> :-)

A source package for a couple of readme files? That seems rather ...
overengineered?

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -