delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
Path: | not-for-mail |
From: | "Dylan Cuthbert" <dylan AT q-games DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
Subject: | Re: setup overwriting ?experimental? installed packages |
Date: | Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:27:10 +0900 |
Lines: | 36 |
Message-ID: | <aj4ht3$i2c$1@main.gmane.org> |
References: | <20020809182508 DOT GB26049 AT butch DOT jgcomp DOT com> <1028933924 DOT 16094 DOT 192 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | pppa70.kyoto-ip.dti.ne.jp |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | main.gmane.org 1029032675 18508 210.159.246.70 (11 Aug 2002 02:24:35 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:24:35 +0000 (UTC) |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Hey Robert, for some reason, all your messages (and only yours) appear as attachments in Outlook Express, and you know what mum says about opening attachments from strangers. However, I did open your attachment and don't seem to be infected with anything, and here are my comments: On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 04:25, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Currently you don't. We don't have a heuristic that will consistently > *do the right thing*. > ie: How does setup know that a current release with a version number > greater than an installed experimental release should *not* replace it? I don't think he's complaining about this - the current release should be installed in that case. The problem is, for example, we install gcc 3.1.1 from the exp. listing, then we run setup again and install the latest "current" releases and gcc 3.1.1 gets overwritten by gcc 2.95-3 (or whatever it is). Its also something that's been bothering me, and I've had to re-install numerous exp. packages because of it. I am always checking the partial listings, but it is a painstaking process (and prone to mistakes) when there are a lot of updates - just remembering which exp. packages you installed so you can click them to "keep" is difficult. Regards --------------------------------- Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert. http://www.q-games.com P2P internet radio - http://www.peercast.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |