Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Retraction
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3D51DDF4.2131.95FCA6F@localhost>
References:	<3D51DDF4 DOT 2131 DOT 95FCA6F AT localhost>
Date:	08 Aug 2002 17:13:39 +1000
Message-Id:	<1028790820.20180.11.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 16:56, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
<snip>

Chris,
    It appears that the flame fest is still festering.=20

I really hesitate to ask this, but can we set a deadline, effective from
your reply to this email (should you reply, and it being affirmative),
and any emails continuing the flame fest sent after that point result in
a ban on the individual sending the email (with appropriate headers
inspected for forging, of course).=20

This list is *so* much better when it stays vaguely on-topic. I'd really
hate to have to take a holiday, like Chuck, but I can't meaningfully
process the sheer volume of off-topic email that has occured recently.

Rob

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9UhojI5+kQ8LJcoIRAp23AJ9S25wa2IvH8SEtpUdMvF+IfubGvgCfe4dJ
5uxb9vrChh/kQOw75VBD/IQ=
=BaBh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV--

- Raw text -