Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<01af01c23dab$0e4e0010$a352a518@samsystem>
From:	"Samuel" <samuel AT socal DOT rr DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<79218202D4B9D4118A290002A508E13B79C391 AT PNZEXCHANGE>
Subject:	Re: new vs malloc, was BUG - Cygwin to GNU CC compatibility
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:40:40 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Smith" <rosss AT pharos DOT co DOT nz>
To: "'Chan Kar Heng'" <karheng AT softhome DOT net>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: new vs malloc, was BUG - Cygwin to GNU CC compatibility
>
> No user code should ever use "delete"; it should only appear in the
> implementation of a container or smart pointer.

What? I must misunderstand what is meant, since user code must always use
"delete" for each "new", unless the documentation of a function clearly
states that it is the function's responsibility to "delete".



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -