Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/08/04/21:58:56
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Stephen C. Biggs wrote:
> Am I right? Did someone make a small error?
>
> I just tried to update my cygwin installation and found that there was
> version 1.3.12-3 of the cygwin DLL. Downloading and looking at the
> resulting installed DLL in /bin gives a version of 1.3.12 and file date
> a couple of days before Version 1.3.12-1!
>
> This seems to be the case for a couple of mirrors:
> http://archive.progeny.com and http://planetmirror.com .
I believe the 1.3.12-3 refers to the version of the main cygwin package,
not the dll. See http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00168.html
It's a question for the packagers whether the dll version should be
consistent with the package version.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -