Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: "Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Samuel <samuel AT socal DOT rr DOT com>
Cc:	Cygwin mailing list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<01f101c23b56$2ec2f4b0$a352a518@samsystem>
References:	<01f101c23b56$2ec2f4b0$a352a518 AT samsystem>
Date:	04 Aug 2002 12:35:54 +1000
Message-Id:	<1028428555.9565.155.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

--=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 11:28, Samuel wrote:
> In the "Reply-To:" munging article that Randall referred to that is at:
>=20
> <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
>=20
> it says:
>=20
>     they haven't bothered to learn to use the ``reply-to-group'' feature =
of
> their mailer
>=20
> Is that implying that the reply-to-group feature should work for mailing
> lists?

Yes, but when reading that article, please remember that the author is
focused on unix mail clients, which tend to be more feature rich (IMO)
that win32 mail clients - particularly MS ones.

Rob


--=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj1MkwoACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoIFTACfSL5mVyDc8Vt5fnTmPwURWc37
DqsAmgO892AQM/ZCoHLdFvNF6B+EPLwe
=8uVa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p--

- Raw text -