Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Pathname context
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	dwyatt AT sunflower DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3D4B5AEF.32421.3651B0CF@localhost>
References:	<3D4B5AEF DOT 32421 DOT 3651B0CF AT localhost>
Date:	03 Aug 2002 20:24:50 +1000
Message-Id:	<1028370295.8690.117.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

--=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 19:24, Doug Wyatt wrote:
>=20
> Yesterday morning I posted a query about 'ls' seeing /usr/lib as a
> proper Cygwin directory using one pathname and as a DOS/Windows
> directory (absent the mounted /lib contents) with what I thought was
> an equivalent pathname.  Perhaps it was overlooked in all the P.D.
> hoopla.

The behaviour is expected based on your mount table.

Rob


--=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj1Lr3IACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoJOsACgzsWB+KkkdmK+oDM8j6U4cKr6
Xf4AoJSNJVX1spfucDr+qZDs7jxvm0yv
=R0Ag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv--

- Raw text -