Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:49:25 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [RFC] an alternative to rebasing
In-reply-to:	<20020802151403.56afae59.steven.obrien2@ntlworld.com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020802194925.GA2308@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
References:	<20020802151403 DOT 56afae59 DOT steven DOT obrien2 AT ntlworld DOT com>

Steven,

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:14:03PM +0100, Steven O'Brien wrote:
> I have done some simple tests that fail with cygwin1.dll-1.3.12-2, but
> succeed with my patched dll. I am also running the gnome desktop and
> core apps which depend on run-time loaded dlls to function and that is
> OK. I would like package maintainers who would otherwise need rebasing
> (Jason?) to try my patch and report results here if they can find
> time.

I will try your patch out on Python first thing on Monday morning.
Unfortunately, I seem to be having problems getting Python to fail to
fork() due to rebase problems lately...

Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -