Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/08/02/13:41:32
CGF: Thanks for the backhanded answer you supplied. The program you
mentioned would be a nice thing to have it didnt crash the
NT server. (Ive already sent a bug complaint to the developer).
Chris J: Thanks for looking into this.
In the meantime I will dig around for something stable. I certainly hope
that there will be a Cygwin version of lsof sometime in the near future.
Thanks
Scott Birl Scott DOT Birl AT temple DOT edu
UNIX Consultant/Systems Administrator Computer Services Temple University
1805 North Broad Street Philadelphia Pennsylvania 19122 United States
====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====+====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====*
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:15:23 +0100
From: Chris January <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: lsof
[ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
> I searched the Cygwin website for lsof and found nothing, and I know
that
> this question could be directed to the lsof list but I could not
subscribe
> to it.
>
> Here's my question:
>
> Will there be any plans to port lsof to Cygwin?
>
> I cant think of any NT utility to do what lsof does, and I tried to
> compile lsof 4.55 sometime ago, but it failed (though I cant remember
why)
This could be done through /proc in future, perhaps.
I will look into it.
Chris
[ Part 6: "Included Message" ]
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:07:08 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: lsof (porting plans)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:01:42PM -0400, Birl wrote:
>I searched the Cygwin website for lsof and found nothing, and I know that
>this question could be directed to the lsof list but I could not
subscribe
>to it.
>
>Here's my question:
>
>Will there be any plans to port lsof to Cygwin?
If you searched the cygwin web site, including mailing list archives and
found no mention of lsof then it is a very safe bet that there are no
plans to port it.
I hope that this message, which is now in the archives, will serve to
make this clear for future people searching for a port of whatever.
In the meantime, if you want a generic windows utility which does
something
similar to lsof (which I had to lookup by the way -- it would be nice
if people didn't assume that everyone else shared their knowledge of
packages they want ported), check out http://www.sysinternals.com .
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -