Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R Van Sickle" <tiberius AT braemarinc DOT com>
To:	"Cygwin Mailing List \(E-mail\)" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: bug: hard links to soft links do not work
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:17:33 -0500
Message-ID:	<001201c239b1$9dddf940$2101a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:21:43PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > >
> > >actually, this is very easy:
> > >
> > >(defmethod hard-link :around (from to)
> > >  (if (symbolic-link-p to)
> > >      (symbolic-link from (resolve-symbolic-link to))
> > >      (call-next-method)))
> > >
> > >i.e., when the target is a symlink, you symlink to its target.
> >
> > Is that *lisp* code?  This makes it easy because...?  I don't quite
> > follow.  Obviously anyone can conceive of some logic to make this fail
> > but without looking at the actual code in question it isn't going to
> > be too useful.
>
> the above is indeed CLOS code of how link() should actually be
> implemented in the cygwin libc.

Whoah, now hang on guys, nobody told me we were switching to all-Lisp
all-the-time.  You can just count me *out*.  I don't go for all that
overparenthetical jive.  ;-)

--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Braemar Inc.
11481 Rupp Dr.
Burnsville, MN 55337


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -