Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Robert Praetorius" <RPraetorius AT AspenRes DOT Com>
Organization:	Ministry of Hobo Regalia, Gauntlet Division
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:45:24 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: HPUX 11
Reply-to:	RPraetorius AT AspenRes DOT Com
CC:	"Flowers, Charmaine (contractor)" <FlowersC AT MTMC DOT ARMY DOT MIL>
Message-ID:	<3D492D64.18378.E00E24@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<6318D0028701D3119DB30000D11BB1A9060CA593@hq10.army.mil>

> Are the Cygwin commands compatible with HPUX 11?
> Thanks in advance

     My recollection (from having used all 5 at a previous job some years 
ago) was that HPUX was closer to GNU/Linux than Solaris and AIX, but not 
as close at OSF/1akaDigitalUNIXakaTru64.

     My solution was to obtain/build GNU utilities for all the systems I 
used regularly, so I didn't have to remember random niggly differences in 
command line options between all the systems.  I highly recommend this 
approach (what was that KO remark about snake oil?).

     Which is to say: most of what you'll see on Cygwin is, in a defacto 
sense, more standard than what you'll see on HPUX (because the GNU 
utilities have been ported to many more platforms that HPUX utilities.  
POSIX or POSIXish utilities can be had on many platforms, but are of less, 
ummmmm, utility than GNU utilities).


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -